This wasn't exactly the software's target application, he adds. Typically, the software's work-order component was meant to combine parts of the same assembly, such as all the parts needed for a home appliance. "We were leaning this software more toward larger manufacturers, but we're finding a lot of customers have some really clever uses for optimizing their material utilization, and basically mixing together multiple jobs of low-volume runs." The approach works for day-to-day needs in which a "small shop treats each day as one product." Users simply "drag and drop" part data onto the work order, whether from a parts database or a parametric library of shapes, such as a library of HVAC ductwork components the company released this year. Punched-Part Databases Any parts database used for nesting, however, has to be a bit more packed with information for punch-press operations than for laser or torch cutting, notes Thompson. In a punched-part database, part entries have to define what punches and tool sizes are needed to make each feature, and indicate whether to nibble or punch an entire hole, for example. "Laser-cut parts are much less ambiguous. You don't have to make all those decisions ahead of time." Tooling complications in punch-press nesting can be simplified by data-sharing programs like the one from Striker Systems (White House, TN). The company's Mike Boggs says the PARTshare application is being released to handle part data for both SolidWorks and Autodesk Inventor platforms. "Basically, the PARTshare library allows engineers to save parts directly in the same library that is used for nesting," says Boggs. For punch-press fab, a programmer retrieves the current part data, enters tooling information needed for manufacturing, and saves this tooled version of the data back into the library. This helps coordinate a shop's engineering and manufacturing, letting each department view current part data simultaneously. The software addresses issues that interfere with getting the proper nests, schedules, and NC programs to the shop floor automatically. With CNC laser or plasma cutting, with only a single tool path, it's easier to operate in an automatic, "hands-off" mode, he says. But "a hands-off scenario such as this is much more difficult with a turret punch press because of numerous tooling issues." Nesting Accommodated for Punching Training instructor Dave Lowrie of Merry Mechanization Inc. (MMI) (Englewood, FL) agrees that parts nesting for punching machines can be a real challenge. "The total number of tool stations and the availability of auto-index stations are just two considerations that will have an effect on the nesting process. "For example, what happens if a nest contains parts with a greater variety of hole sizes than there are punch stations to accommodate them?" As a solution, MMI's approach allows complete tool loads to be saved. The user can then search a sheetmetal database for all parts that use the same tool load before creating the nest. This ensures adequate tooling for all the nested parts. And what about the limitations of auto-index stations on typical punching machines? True-shape nesters can turn parts through any angle, which is essential for cutting machines, but a lower-cost, rectangular-shape nester can be used to rotate parts in 90-degree increments for punching. Non-rectangular parts can be put into material-optimized "sub-nests," which can be added to the larger nest with the company's programming, says Lowrie. Suppliers of packaged software are also upgrading products to streamline production flow by speeding up nesting and punch programming. The new release of SigmaNEST software from SigmaTEK Corp. (Cincinnati) features Auto Dynamic Nesting, which reportedly allows a punching machine to "tool on the fly," enabling faster programming and increased throughput. This upgrade has been "pre-released" to a general fabrication shop in Georgia for just-in-time production, says the company's Glenn Binder. The fabricator uses the program to nest parts at the last possible moment before production, allowing substantially reduced inventories and freeing up cash. Likewise, dedicated machine software is being upgraded for more flexible fabrication. For its punching and shearing machines, Salvagnini America (Hamilton, OH) is releasing Metalnest, an application that's replacing its current Autonest program. ![]() Forming Technologies' BlankNest optimizes nesting for blanking, based on raw coil width and pitch. Besides being easier to use, the new software accommodates parametric part programs. "This means we can have on the machine a small number of master programs that can produce a very wide set of parts," says application manager Ricky Hansson. By assigning numbers to specific parameter values, the software allows the user to preview processing results (see lead photo). The software also allows the user to choose from algorithms for a specific "format optimization"--that is, to nest parts for improved process attributes other than material utilization. For example, "the user can decide that the best format is one with minimum scrap, minimum time, or the one that guarantees a predefined sequence of parts," says Hansson. And for machines with integrated shears, the software can also manage the lengths of blanks cut from coil, calculating the ideal lengths for various part nests. Blank Nesting As with processes that cut or punch out small parts, large-scale press-blanking operations can also benefit from nesting software, says Dan Marinac, director of business development for Forming Technologies Inc. (FTI) (Oakville, ON, Canada). Stampers have similar concerns about sheet utilization as fabricators. But the differences in their processes are significant: blanks are cut with press dies from a continuously fed steel coil rather than from a sheet of fixed size. Thus, FTI specifically designed its BlankNest program for transfer-press stampers who are producing high-volume developed blank shapes. This software addresses nesting issues unique to blanking, explains Marinac. Each stroke of a blanking press cuts one or two blanks from the coil, requiring "one-up" or "two-up" nests. "In the case of a one-up nest, all blanks are in exactly the same orientation. Because these stampers can custom-order coils of steel in any width, the software must perform a double optimization: it must optimize for both blank orientation and coil width. "A two-up nest layout typically will improve material utilization by nesting the blanks more efficiently. This is done by producing two blanks in different orientations for each press stroke. To produce blanks in this manner, a more complex blanking die is required. Therefore, material savings due to improved material utilization must justify the increased tool cost." Material efficiency is also improved in situations where left- and right-handed parts of an assembly can be nested together. ![]() Mazak's nesting software, for use with its 3-D rotary lasers, nests individual parts cut from tubes and pipes up to a foot in diameter. BlankNest reportedly saves time and improves accuracy over makeshift approaches to blank nesting, he adds. "Typically, most people involved in nesting calculations today use a simple 2-D CAD system and a trial-and-error process to guess at the optimum layout, or they use cardboard cutouts to try different scenarios." Using software is a step forward from this approach. Nesting in 3-D The need for nesting is not limited to flat materials. Nesting software can add efficiency to the 3-D world of tube and pipe cutting--target of a new application from Mazak Nissho Iwai Corp. (Schaumberg, IL). Mazak's "FG CAM" was developed for nesting parts within tubes, pipes, and related "stick" shapes up to 40' (12 m) long. The company developed the software for new users of its 3-D rotary lasers. FG CAM creates nests for all sizes of raw material the lasers can process--up to 11.8" (300 mm) in diameter and 0.875" (22.2 mm) in wall thickness. ![]() Strippit's CADMAN 3-D software unfolds, nests, and sequences 3-D part models, integrating cutting, punching, and bending operations (click on the image to enlarge). Nesting requires only a few interactive steps, says engineer Tim O'Donnell. Users enter the "stick's" raw length and the spacing or gap between parts, which is usually around a half inch (13 mm). They then browse part directories, clicking on individual part numbers and quantities to build a list. "As soon as you enter the first part, the software displays the pipe's shape, diameter, and wall thickness," he says. "It also displays the remaining material on the stick," automatically subtracting any "dead zone" regions needed for chuck holding or part-handling. Finally, the program generates the cutting code for the nest for transfer to the machine control. In software for non-cylindrical 3-D parts, multiple operations are being united by programming that unfolds 3-D data and sequences a complete fabrication process. Strippit/LVD's offline software package integrates laser cutting, turret punching, and press-brake bending (designated CADMAN-L, -P, and -B 3D, respectively). The software imports wire-frame and solid-model data, networking it with the three fabrication technologies. The 3-D model is unfolded into a 2-D design to create cutting/punching nests. Data is then sent to the bending module, which calculates bend allowance correction factors and sequences. "We tie all these fabricating technologies together with CADMAN, which is sort of the glue that holds them all together," says Strippit's Shawn Thompson. The Caveats of Estimating Nest Efficiency It can be difficult to weigh the effectiveness of different parts-nesting methods. Just determining a reliable, meaningful measurement of sheet-usage efficiency isn't as easy as it may seem--and the resulting numbers can sometimes be misleading, explains Merry Mechanization's David Witts. ![]() In a typical parts nest for a particular day's run, it's clear that near-100% sheet utilization is impossible, even with large, rectangular parts. There are gaps between parts, and holes cut within parts (although small holes normally aren't counted as "scrap" in calculations). And there are often partial part runs leaving remnant sheets that may or may not be reusable the next day. Calculating a usable, reliable utilization percentage depends on making several assumptions, says Witts. For instance, should the gripper strips or clamped edges of the sheet be included in nest-efficiency calculations? Including the borders of the sheet, while describing reality better, inevitably decreases the percentage. "Some companies still use a 4" (100 mm) gripper strip and 0.5" (13 mm) borders, which results in a 10.6% loss on a 72 X 48" (1830 X 1220 mm) sheet, even before we begin nesting," explains Witts. Some nesting software calculates the utilization percentage based only on the usable area of the sheet, while Merry Mechanization calculates it from the original sheet. There's also the gap material between adjacent parts. "Even common-edge cutting results in unusable strips of material." This is illustrated by a nest of 34 simple rectangular parts, 71 X 1" (1800 X 25.4 mm) in size, in a 72 X 48" (1830 X 1220 mm) sheet. Assuming minimal border strips, common-edge cutting 0.25" (6.4 mm) wide results in less than 70% sheet utilization, "although to the eye, the sheet looks remarkably well-filled," adds Witts. "Ultimately, the best evaluation of a nest is by sight," he advises. "Don't become focused on unattainable sheet-utilization percentages, but rely on a nesting package that can make the best layout of the parts you need to work with in any given production run." For more information about nesting tools, see the contact information at the end of the main article. MAGBUY | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|